You can always find the libturd in a conversation. They're the one reading every post repeatedly hoping to find a typo so that they can pretend that a typo is some sort of an example of a weak mind. Of course, it couldn't have anything to do with extra large hands, being in a hurry, poor eyesight, distraction nor a defective keyboard, could it, genius? Among your kind, that is what passes for "substantive factual debate". "I found a typo so I won the argument". Yuh...wutever....
I wouldn't know. I'd have to take your word for it, as I've never run into one that wasn't a libturd who was losing an argument & grasping at straws. If that fails, they can always try to play the race card instead.
Ad-hominem fallacies are perhaps my biggest pet peeve! I try to explain that because they cannot find a legit response they feel the need to attack a persons character or morality. In response they often just keep repeating their same baseless argument. It's like they are stuck on repeat. BTW I have seen people of all stances use ad-hominem. They really need to teach the media about the meaning of ad-hominem. They are the worst! I am not choosing sides in the Rittenhouse trial but ad-hominem probably caused him to win the case. Even legal prosecutions these days are vulnerable to such childish behavior.
No. Rittenhouse won his case because of (a) video tape evidence showing him running away from the mob chasing him and (b) the testimony of the prosecutionтАЩs main witness, the guy who got his arm blown off by Rittenhouse because he pointed his Glock In RittenhouseтАЩs face. Add in the way the self-defense laws are written and the nature of gun regulations in Wisconsin in particular and you have a situation where no matter how outrageous RittenhouseтАЩs presence was, he was still going to get off.
Note that I am in no way defending him. His lack of judgment was typical of an unsupervised minor male with a fascination for guns and the police, who saw himself as Robin Hood. WouldnтАЩt it have been great if his father, who lives in Kenosha, had said to him, listen kid, put the AR-15 back in the shed and go have a milkshake with your friends. Nothing good will come of your good intentions. But no.
There were and are and will always be ad hominem attacks on RittenhouseтАЩs character, lies about who he was, where he came from and what his intentions were. It is appalling to hear public figures, politicians, and journalists regurgitate these falsehoods over and over again, as though Rittenhouse was a psychotic Unabomber type with a racist vendetta, driving across 37 state lines so he could go and kill blacks, with his big old gun on the front seat. It would be laughable if it werenтАЩt so pernicious to hear people with a big platform lie and lie and lie some more.
But the case was decided on legal grounds, the kind of grounds that need to be revisited and probably wonтАЩt be, because we love our guns so much.
I recommend a current article in Quillette by a legal scholar named Ronald Sullivan, which explains the rule of law and how it accrued to Rittenhouse in this case. Sullivan is also not a fan of RittenhouseтАЩs actions, but thank goodness he knows the law and writes and thinks with an objectivity that we rarely have access to anymore.
Well said. People always use the тАЬRittenhouse shouldnтАЩt have been thereтАЭ non-argument. If thatтАЩs the logic then blm shouldnтАЩt have been there either. They have a right to protest PEACEFULLY but no right to riot. Had the police and the politicians done their jobs none of this would have happened. One good thing about it is Kyle took out the garbage that night. If there was a victim out of this whole ordeal it was Kyle Rittenhouse. I donтАЩt think the world will miss a couple of pea-doughs.
Can't be one of ours. Trash morals are the domain of the left. That's what this whole (hole) article is about. You can have her. She's likely right out of one of your "Gender Queer" (like the kids' book) recruitment orientation gulags.
"Recruitment orientation gulags"? Apparently lying is not one of the trash morals you object to. But I've always found the right to be full of moral relativists.
You must be a Politikal Ofizer at one of said gulags. Otherwise, the term wouldn't bother you. Or are you comically going to try to make the argument that homosexual recruitment/grooming and racial stereotyping isn't occurring in the recruitment orientation gulags, aka "public schools". Because if you try, we're going to laugh and point at you. You haven't a leg to stand on
It *is* happening, and parents can now see it, thanks to the on-line schooling created by the pandemic. All the political gaslighting in the world won't stop parents from complaining about what they've seen.
You all are out of your freaking minds. Do you truly believe what these teachers did was grooming and the school is a gulag, suggesting this school is equal to a Soviet labor camp? I think you might have assumed a gulag was Nazi.
Good lick with your career. It may go further if you learn to use left parentheses.
You can always find the libturd in a conversation. They're the one reading every post repeatedly hoping to find a typo so that they can pretend that a typo is some sort of an example of a weak mind. Of course, it couldn't have anything to do with extra large hands, being in a hurry, poor eyesight, distraction nor a defective keyboard, could it, genius? Among your kind, that is what passes for "substantive factual debate". "I found a typo so I won the argument". Yuh...wutever....
Seriously? Anyone of any integrity would admit there are typo police on both sides of the aisle.
I wouldn't know. I'd have to take your word for it, as I've never run into one that wasn't a libturd who was losing an argument & grasping at straws. If that fails, they can always try to play the race card instead.
Ummm, I think he was addressing Paula the bot? ЁЯШВ
Ad-hominem fallacies are perhaps my biggest pet peeve! I try to explain that because they cannot find a legit response they feel the need to attack a persons character or morality. In response they often just keep repeating their same baseless argument. It's like they are stuck on repeat. BTW I have seen people of all stances use ad-hominem. They really need to teach the media about the meaning of ad-hominem. They are the worst! I am not choosing sides in the Rittenhouse trial but ad-hominem probably caused him to win the case. Even legal prosecutions these days are vulnerable to such childish behavior.
No. Rittenhouse won his case because of (a) video tape evidence showing him running away from the mob chasing him and (b) the testimony of the prosecutionтАЩs main witness, the guy who got his arm blown off by Rittenhouse because he pointed his Glock In RittenhouseтАЩs face. Add in the way the self-defense laws are written and the nature of gun regulations in Wisconsin in particular and you have a situation where no matter how outrageous RittenhouseтАЩs presence was, he was still going to get off.
Note that I am in no way defending him. His lack of judgment was typical of an unsupervised minor male with a fascination for guns and the police, who saw himself as Robin Hood. WouldnтАЩt it have been great if his father, who lives in Kenosha, had said to him, listen kid, put the AR-15 back in the shed and go have a milkshake with your friends. Nothing good will come of your good intentions. But no.
There were and are and will always be ad hominem attacks on RittenhouseтАЩs character, lies about who he was, where he came from and what his intentions were. It is appalling to hear public figures, politicians, and journalists regurgitate these falsehoods over and over again, as though Rittenhouse was a psychotic Unabomber type with a racist vendetta, driving across 37 state lines so he could go and kill blacks, with his big old gun on the front seat. It would be laughable if it werenтАЩt so pernicious to hear people with a big platform lie and lie and lie some more.
But the case was decided on legal grounds, the kind of grounds that need to be revisited and probably wonтАЩt be, because we love our guns so much.
I recommend a current article in Quillette by a legal scholar named Ronald Sullivan, which explains the rule of law and how it accrued to Rittenhouse in this case. Sullivan is also not a fan of RittenhouseтАЩs actions, but thank goodness he knows the law and writes and thinks with an objectivity that we rarely have access to anymore.
Again, confusion.
No more buildings were burned down in Kenosha.
This is because the people stepped into the gap left by Marxized officials, to quell the Marxists.
The People are of Original Authority in America, gifted them by God. They rule.
The Rulers do not bear the sword in vain for those who do evil.
Christ's Liberty is thus preserved.
.
.
See, Romans 13, Galatians 5 & Proverbs 1,
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Romans-Chapter-13
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Galatians-Chapter-5
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Proverbs-Chapter-1
.
.
This is the operation of Natural Law from Nature's God, as the Declaration of Independence memorialized.
When you have accepted that America is a Christian Nation your repentance will become self-actuated.
.
Well said. People always use the тАЬRittenhouse shouldnтАЩt have been thereтАЭ non-argument. If thatтАЩs the logic then blm shouldnтАЩt have been there either. They have a right to protest PEACEFULLY but no right to riot. Had the police and the politicians done their jobs none of this would have happened. One good thing about it is Kyle took out the garbage that night. If there was a victim out of this whole ordeal it was Kyle Rittenhouse. I donтАЩt think the world will miss a couple of pea-doughs.
Clearly, she only appeals to those on the right.
Can't be one of ours. Trash morals are the domain of the left. That's what this whole (hole) article is about. You can have her. She's likely right out of one of your "Gender Queer" (like the kids' book) recruitment orientation gulags.
"Recruitment orientation gulags"? Apparently lying is not one of the trash morals you object to. But I've always found the right to be full of moral relativists.
You must be a Politikal Ofizer at one of said gulags. Otherwise, the term wouldn't bother you. Or are you comically going to try to make the argument that homosexual recruitment/grooming and racial stereotyping isn't occurring in the recruitment orientation gulags, aka "public schools". Because if you try, we're going to laugh and point at you. You haven't a leg to stand on
It is not happening and you are a bigot
It *is* happening, and parents can now see it, thanks to the on-line schooling created by the pandemic. All the political gaslighting in the world won't stop parents from complaining about what they've seen.
You all are out of your freaking minds. Do you truly believe what these teachers did was grooming and the school is a gulag, suggesting this school is equal to a Soviet labor camp? I think you might have assumed a gulag was Nazi.
No, we're complaining about blatant Socialist, Antifa and BLM propaganda being taught in the grade schools.
Yup, you are truly out of your mind. Your poor kids....
The kids complain about it too.