You can always find the libturd in a conversation. They're the one reading every post repeatedly hoping to find a typo so that they can pretend that a typo is some sort of an example of a weak mind. Of course, it couldn't have anything to do with extra large hands, being in a hurry, poor eyesight, distraction nor a defective keyboard, c…
You can always find the libturd in a conversation. They're the one reading every post repeatedly hoping to find a typo so that they can pretend that a typo is some sort of an example of a weak mind. Of course, it couldn't have anything to do with extra large hands, being in a hurry, poor eyesight, distraction nor a defective keyboard, could it, genius? Among your kind, that is what passes for "substantive factual debate". "I found a typo so I won the argument". Yuh...wutever....
I wouldn't know. I'd have to take your word for it, as I've never run into one that wasn't a libturd who was losing an argument & grasping at straws. If that fails, they can always try to play the race card instead.
Ad-hominem fallacies are perhaps my biggest pet peeve! I try to explain that because they cannot find a legit response they feel the need to attack a persons character or morality. In response they often just keep repeating their same baseless argument. It's like they are stuck on repeat. BTW I have seen people of all stances use ad-hominem. They really need to teach the media about the meaning of ad-hominem. They are the worst! I am not choosing sides in the Rittenhouse trial but ad-hominem probably caused him to win the case. Even legal prosecutions these days are vulnerable to such childish behavior.
No. Rittenhouse won his case because of (a) video tape evidence showing him running away from the mob chasing him and (b) the testimony of the prosecution’s main witness, the guy who got his arm blown off by Rittenhouse because he pointed his Glock In Rittenhouse’s face. Add in the way the self-defense laws are written and the nature of gun regulations in Wisconsin in particular and you have a situation where no matter how outrageous Rittenhouse’s presence was, he was still going to get off.
Note that I am in no way defending him. His lack of judgment was typical of an unsupervised minor male with a fascination for guns and the police, who saw himself as Robin Hood. Wouldn’t it have been great if his father, who lives in Kenosha, had said to him, listen kid, put the AR-15 back in the shed and go have a milkshake with your friends. Nothing good will come of your good intentions. But no.
There were and are and will always be ad hominem attacks on Rittenhouse’s character, lies about who he was, where he came from and what his intentions were. It is appalling to hear public figures, politicians, and journalists regurgitate these falsehoods over and over again, as though Rittenhouse was a psychotic Unabomber type with a racist vendetta, driving across 37 state lines so he could go and kill blacks, with his big old gun on the front seat. It would be laughable if it weren’t so pernicious to hear people with a big platform lie and lie and lie some more.
But the case was decided on legal grounds, the kind of grounds that need to be revisited and probably won’t be, because we love our guns so much.
I recommend a current article in Quillette by a legal scholar named Ronald Sullivan, which explains the rule of law and how it accrued to Rittenhouse in this case. Sullivan is also not a fan of Rittenhouse’s actions, but thank goodness he knows the law and writes and thinks with an objectivity that we rarely have access to anymore.
Well said. People always use the “Rittenhouse shouldn’t have been there” non-argument. If that’s the logic then blm shouldn’t have been there either. They have a right to protest PEACEFULLY but no right to riot. Had the police and the politicians done their jobs none of this would have happened. One good thing about it is Kyle took out the garbage that night. If there was a victim out of this whole ordeal it was Kyle Rittenhouse. I don’t think the world will miss a couple of pea-doughs.
You can always find the libturd in a conversation. They're the one reading every post repeatedly hoping to find a typo so that they can pretend that a typo is some sort of an example of a weak mind. Of course, it couldn't have anything to do with extra large hands, being in a hurry, poor eyesight, distraction nor a defective keyboard, could it, genius? Among your kind, that is what passes for "substantive factual debate". "I found a typo so I won the argument". Yuh...wutever....
Seriously? Anyone of any integrity would admit there are typo police on both sides of the aisle.
I wouldn't know. I'd have to take your word for it, as I've never run into one that wasn't a libturd who was losing an argument & grasping at straws. If that fails, they can always try to play the race card instead.
Ummm, I think he was addressing Paula the bot? 😂
Ad-hominem fallacies are perhaps my biggest pet peeve! I try to explain that because they cannot find a legit response they feel the need to attack a persons character or morality. In response they often just keep repeating their same baseless argument. It's like they are stuck on repeat. BTW I have seen people of all stances use ad-hominem. They really need to teach the media about the meaning of ad-hominem. They are the worst! I am not choosing sides in the Rittenhouse trial but ad-hominem probably caused him to win the case. Even legal prosecutions these days are vulnerable to such childish behavior.
No. Rittenhouse won his case because of (a) video tape evidence showing him running away from the mob chasing him and (b) the testimony of the prosecution’s main witness, the guy who got his arm blown off by Rittenhouse because he pointed his Glock In Rittenhouse’s face. Add in the way the self-defense laws are written and the nature of gun regulations in Wisconsin in particular and you have a situation where no matter how outrageous Rittenhouse’s presence was, he was still going to get off.
Note that I am in no way defending him. His lack of judgment was typical of an unsupervised minor male with a fascination for guns and the police, who saw himself as Robin Hood. Wouldn’t it have been great if his father, who lives in Kenosha, had said to him, listen kid, put the AR-15 back in the shed and go have a milkshake with your friends. Nothing good will come of your good intentions. But no.
There were and are and will always be ad hominem attacks on Rittenhouse’s character, lies about who he was, where he came from and what his intentions were. It is appalling to hear public figures, politicians, and journalists regurgitate these falsehoods over and over again, as though Rittenhouse was a psychotic Unabomber type with a racist vendetta, driving across 37 state lines so he could go and kill blacks, with his big old gun on the front seat. It would be laughable if it weren’t so pernicious to hear people with a big platform lie and lie and lie some more.
But the case was decided on legal grounds, the kind of grounds that need to be revisited and probably won’t be, because we love our guns so much.
I recommend a current article in Quillette by a legal scholar named Ronald Sullivan, which explains the rule of law and how it accrued to Rittenhouse in this case. Sullivan is also not a fan of Rittenhouse’s actions, but thank goodness he knows the law and writes and thinks with an objectivity that we rarely have access to anymore.
Again, confusion.
No more buildings were burned down in Kenosha.
This is because the people stepped into the gap left by Marxized officials, to quell the Marxists.
The People are of Original Authority in America, gifted them by God. They rule.
The Rulers do not bear the sword in vain for those who do evil.
Christ's Liberty is thus preserved.
.
.
See, Romans 13, Galatians 5 & Proverbs 1,
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Romans-Chapter-13
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Galatians-Chapter-5
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Proverbs-Chapter-1
.
.
This is the operation of Natural Law from Nature's God, as the Declaration of Independence memorialized.
When you have accepted that America is a Christian Nation your repentance will become self-actuated.
.
Well said. People always use the “Rittenhouse shouldn’t have been there” non-argument. If that’s the logic then blm shouldn’t have been there either. They have a right to protest PEACEFULLY but no right to riot. Had the police and the politicians done their jobs none of this would have happened. One good thing about it is Kyle took out the garbage that night. If there was a victim out of this whole ordeal it was Kyle Rittenhouse. I don’t think the world will miss a couple of pea-doughs.