If only it was just limited to big business elites. The truth is much darker than this. Take another example, most educated people have learned to attribute the madness of the Cultural Revolution to Mao and his gang of acolytes. The real problem though was the tens of millions of biddable, favour-seeking, grudge-bearing 'ordinary folk' w…
If only it was just limited to big business elites. The truth is much darker than this. Take another example, most educated people have learned to attribute the madness of the Cultural Revolution to Mao and his gang of acolytes. The real problem though was the tens of millions of biddable, favour-seeking, grudge-bearing 'ordinary folk' who made Mao important in the first place. Its exactly the same now with millions of tertiary 'educated' bureaucrats and administrators etc etc who do these gender fanatics' bidding. Why did our wonderful Western 'free' media ever give voice and traction to this tiny tiny minority's obsessions in the first place. THAT is the real Western disease
My own answer - for what it's worth - is that it is a downside inherent in mass media that it will give a disproportionately large voice to certain kinds....the politico-obsessive, the mouthy and malcontent especially. More balanced people will simply be far less likely to be forever spouting their opinions. A tragedy really.
If only it was just limited to big business elites. The truth is much darker than this. Take another example, most educated people have learned to attribute the madness of the Cultural Revolution to Mao and his gang of acolytes. The real problem though was the tens of millions of biddable, favour-seeking, grudge-bearing 'ordinary folk' who made Mao important in the first place. Its exactly the same now with millions of tertiary 'educated' bureaucrats and administrators etc etc who do these gender fanatics' bidding. Why did our wonderful Western 'free' media ever give voice and traction to this tiny tiny minority's obsessions in the first place. THAT is the real Western disease
And that remains a mystery. It's crucial to understand what's going on here, yet it remains inscrutable. At least to this troubled observer...
My own answer - for what it's worth - is that it is a downside inherent in mass media that it will give a disproportionately large voice to certain kinds....the politico-obsessive, the mouthy and malcontent especially. More balanced people will simply be far less likely to be forever spouting their opinions. A tragedy really.