In humans, embryos are defined as developing humans until 8 weeks then they are called fetuses, which is means "young child." And yes, the point is to incubate until ready to be born, like all mammals. Why do we put preemies in an "incubator"? But to define a mother as an incubator is a very limited and view of motherhood, the beauty and awe of creation and of children.
In humans, embryos are defined as developing humans until 8 weeks then they are called fetuses, which is means "young child." And yes, the point is to incubate until ready to be born, like all mammals. Why do we put preemies in an "incubator"? But to define a mother as an incubator is a very limited and view of motherhood, the beauty and awe of creation and of children.
There is the option of not getting pregnant. We know what behavior might result in a baby. The baby is also a life and not an expendable tumor. So, once having created life you believe the "mother" can then end the life of the developing baby. It is a good question and we probably should err on the side of caution by realizing that we are in fact ending a human life. If the "mother" doesn't want a baby she should not engage in pleasurable behavior only to end the life that behavior produces. It is demeaning to the baby who has not had due process, not guilty of any behavior that got him/her there and can reasonably expect the natural protection that is instinctual for a mother toward her young. The fact that we have elevated baby-killing, or unborn baby-killing, separating the "mother" from her natural inclination to love and protect her baby is quite astounding and contrary to nature. Women are also not just sexual playthings because they do have a womb and are made to create and nurture life within it. That means a certain responsibility to that awesome gift. She is not expected to do anything in this society except be sexually available and provide tax revenue to the State, I guess.
Fetus means young baby. And women have the awesome and natural power to grow a human being, create a completely unique person that has its own DNA that is one-of-a-kind. No, women are not incubators. They are givers of life and nurturers and their natural inclination is to protect their babies from any harm. Most mothers will run onto an oncoming train to grab their baby out of harm's way. This is why the business model at Planned Parenthood is to never allow the "mother" to see the ultrasound because nearly 100% will get off the table and walk out. Why is that, do you think? Are they thinking that they are incubators or are they seeing their baby and immediately have powerful love and protective feelings? If she cannot care for the baby it is a huge sacrifice to give her baby over to another family. That, from what I heard, is a very wrenching thing. Was your mother merely an incubator?
Notice the person you're speaking to is not engaging in any meaningful conversation or debate, but only spewing slogans like the sheep in "Animal Farm." This indicates that she knows what you're saying is true or has no reasonable response to it. In either case, the sloganeering is meant to shut you down. Kudos to you for not caving to it and for not caving to the pressures and propaganda created by corporations to con people into thinking nothing of a human life, a baby, as long as it is a fetus. Arguably one of the greatest and successful cons in recent history. You're completely correct, of course. Murdering babies so that women don't have to take responsibility of actions they made is heinous and gross. It is a blight on humanity. Meanwhile, corporations and politicians are making out like bandits on it.
The deeper motive is to destroy and weaken one of the healthiest institutions known to man, the family. It is the foundation, the alpha and beta. Notice that the Left goes after every healthy institution, according to Marxist teachings. Why? To erase the individual as having any intrinsic value outside of his/her value as a budgetary item on a spread sheet for the State. Women as widgets in factories is elevated above motherhood. Fathers' rights taken away or minimized. The Left pretending that mothers and fathers are interchangeable and equal. Until we support strong families and the value of a life, then all else follows. The right to G-d-given life is the foundation of a successful and happy nation.
Yes! Well said. That is the motive of the ppl who are pushing this stuff. The ones doing the indoctrination. The ones in charge. This person above is just a follower. A true believer. Her motive is what she was taught by them, but not their motive. In all likelihood anyway.
but women do incubate new life. if you donтАЩt want babies, great, your body your choice. just get your tubes tied, a simple medical procedure, and have all the unprotected sex you want. have at it. just donтАЩt kill an embryo/fetus/baby because you are a careless and lazy and selfish. you think killing the life growing inside you is empowering? itтАЩs not.
In humans, embryos are defined as developing humans until 8 weeks then they are called fetuses, which is means "young child." And yes, the point is to incubate until ready to be born, like all mammals. Why do we put preemies in an "incubator"? But to define a mother as an incubator is a very limited and view of motherhood, the beauty and awe of creation and of children.
I said a woman is NOT an incubator.
As a human (and not an incubator,) a woman should not be compelled by the state to donate her body and be an incubator for an unwanted pregnancy.
Your etymology is irrelevant. So is your appeal to emotion.
There is the option of not getting pregnant. We know what behavior might result in a baby. The baby is also a life and not an expendable tumor. So, once having created life you believe the "mother" can then end the life of the developing baby. It is a good question and we probably should err on the side of caution by realizing that we are in fact ending a human life. If the "mother" doesn't want a baby she should not engage in pleasurable behavior only to end the life that behavior produces. It is demeaning to the baby who has not had due process, not guilty of any behavior that got him/her there and can reasonably expect the natural protection that is instinctual for a mother toward her young. The fact that we have elevated baby-killing, or unborn baby-killing, separating the "mother" from her natural inclination to love and protect her baby is quite astounding and contrary to nature. Women are also not just sexual playthings because they do have a womb and are made to create and nurture life within it. That means a certain responsibility to that awesome gift. She is not expected to do anything in this society except be sexually available and provide tax revenue to the State, I guess.
Fetuses are not babies. Women are not incubators.
Fetus means young baby. And women have the awesome and natural power to grow a human being, create a completely unique person that has its own DNA that is one-of-a-kind. No, women are not incubators. They are givers of life and nurturers and their natural inclination is to protect their babies from any harm. Most mothers will run onto an oncoming train to grab their baby out of harm's way. This is why the business model at Planned Parenthood is to never allow the "mother" to see the ultrasound because nearly 100% will get off the table and walk out. Why is that, do you think? Are they thinking that they are incubators or are they seeing their baby and immediately have powerful love and protective feelings? If she cannot care for the baby it is a huge sacrifice to give her baby over to another family. That, from what I heard, is a very wrenching thing. Was your mother merely an incubator?
Notice the person you're speaking to is not engaging in any meaningful conversation or debate, but only spewing slogans like the sheep in "Animal Farm." This indicates that she knows what you're saying is true or has no reasonable response to it. In either case, the sloganeering is meant to shut you down. Kudos to you for not caving to it and for not caving to the pressures and propaganda created by corporations to con people into thinking nothing of a human life, a baby, as long as it is a fetus. Arguably one of the greatest and successful cons in recent history. You're completely correct, of course. Murdering babies so that women don't have to take responsibility of actions they made is heinous and gross. It is a blight on humanity. Meanwhile, corporations and politicians are making out like bandits on it.
The deeper motive is to destroy and weaken one of the healthiest institutions known to man, the family. It is the foundation, the alpha and beta. Notice that the Left goes after every healthy institution, according to Marxist teachings. Why? To erase the individual as having any intrinsic value outside of his/her value as a budgetary item on a spread sheet for the State. Women as widgets in factories is elevated above motherhood. Fathers' rights taken away or minimized. The Left pretending that mothers and fathers are interchangeable and equal. Until we support strong families and the value of a life, then all else follows. The right to G-d-given life is the foundation of a successful and happy nation.
Yes! Well said. That is the motive of the ppl who are pushing this stuff. The ones doing the indoctrination. The ones in charge. This person above is just a follower. A true believer. Her motive is what she was taught by them, but not their motive. In all likelihood anyway.
but women do incubate new life. if you donтАЩt want babies, great, your body your choice. just get your tubes tied, a simple medical procedure, and have all the unprotected sex you want. have at it. just donтАЩt kill an embryo/fetus/baby because you are a careless and lazy and selfish. you think killing the life growing inside you is empowering? itтАЩs not.