Perhaps not so meaninglessly trivial considering post-op suicide rates that reach 20 times that of comparable teens... at least not so if they were targeting your child.
Perhaps not so meaninglessly trivial considering post-op suicide rates that reach 20 times that of comparable teens... at least not so if they were targeting your child.
"Not targeting my child"? Why did you think I'm reading this blog? And see above reply: most kids survive hormone distribution, right? The abortion survival rate is well below 0.1%.
As far as I’m aware, a women’s eggs don’t invade a man’s testicles and take his sperm hostage in order to fertilise themselves. A man ejects his jizz into a woman, which then causes a pregnancy. If men were more responsible about where they put their jizz, there would be far less, or no, need for abortions. Do you target men in your anti-abortion vitriol, or just women? I mean, women are easy targets, aren’t they - men are much harder.
Perhaps not so meaninglessly trivial considering post-op suicide rates that reach 20 times that of comparable teens... at least not so if they were targeting your child.
"Not targeting my child"? Why did you think I'm reading this blog? And see above reply: most kids survive hormone distribution, right? The abortion survival rate is well below 0.1%.
As far as I’m aware, a women’s eggs don’t invade a man’s testicles and take his sperm hostage in order to fertilise themselves. A man ejects his jizz into a woman, which then causes a pregnancy. If men were more responsible about where they put their jizz, there would be far less, or no, need for abortions. Do you target men in your anti-abortion vitriol, or just women? I mean, women are easy targets, aren’t they - men are much harder.
Abortion survival rate is nil for the unborn!