Mildred, as I said above, I agree that there are a lot of well intentioned people in the gay rights movement. But I also think most of them are being used as tools by the powerful who have a more purient agenda.
I agree about the nonsensibility of the acronym. The first 3 letters require the binary nature of sexuality and the rest deny …
Mildred, as I said above, I agree that there are a lot of well intentioned people in the gay rights movement. But I also think most of them are being used as tools by the powerful who have a more purient agenda.
I agree about the nonsensibility of the acronym. The first 3 letters require the binary nature of sexuality and the rest deny it. But this is the acronym they (the proponents) have chosen. Gays against Groomers may be a great organization, but they are tiny and have no institutional support among our elites. They don't set the rules of the game, and those that do appear to be setting those rules with the express goal of gaining sexual access to kids.
Mildred, as I said above, I agree that there are a lot of well intentioned people in the gay rights movement. But I also think most of them are being used as tools by the powerful who have a more purient agenda.
I agree about the nonsensibility of the acronym. The first 3 letters require the binary nature of sexuality and the rest deny it. But this is the acronym they (the proponents) have chosen. Gays against Groomers may be a great organization, but they are tiny and have no institutional support among our elites. They don't set the rules of the game, and those that do appear to be setting those rules with the express goal of gaining sexual access to kids.