Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DarkWhite's avatar

I honestly think that the hamstringing of actual feminism and the demonization of lesbians is the point. Lesbians are often the most politically committed and active women, and the most threatening to the patriarchy. If we can get to the point where the most dangerous women can be demonized and all the gains of feminism can be undone under a woke banner, so much the better. Gains made by women are always as fragile as a cloud and just as capable of disappearing with the wind. Now, female-only safe spaces, rape crisis centers, Title IX ... all of it can be done away with by misogynists as long as they put on dresses first.

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

There is missing a crucial component, which also cuts across your conflation of the trans phenomenon with the "hard left." How do you explain the role of billionaires such as "Jennifer" Pritzker, Jon Stryker, "Martine" Rothblatt,? Not only are these people not "hard left," many of them are most definitely on the "right wing" end of the political spectrum. There is BIG money to be made once young people are put on lifelong drugs and surgeries. Sorry, but that money isn't flowing to anyone with politics aimed at empowering the working class, or stopping the US government from overthrowing other governments around the world.

You, James Lindsay, Christopher Rufo, and others pull this sleight of hand on a regular basis now. It's misleading. I'm a long-time leftist, a supporter of women's sex-based rights, and not at all in favor of Robin DiAngelo-type "White Fragility" guilt-baiting. I'm far from alone.

Expand full comment
79 more comments...

No posts